<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 143 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. Kuber Tobacco Products P. Ltd., classifying Gutka/Pan Masala under Heading 24.04 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. Despite initial classification under Heading 21.06, the Tribunal upheld the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the Kothari Products case, deeming Gutka a tobacco product falling under Heading 24.04. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of Supreme Court interpretations, setting aside the Revenue&#039;s classification and confirming the appellant&#039;s position. This case underscores the importance of judicial decisions and adherence to legal precedents in determining the correct classification of goods for excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 143 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. Kuber Tobacco Products P. Ltd., classifying Gutka/Pan Masala under Heading 24.04 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. Despite initial classification under Heading 21.06, the Tribunal upheld the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the Kothari Products case, deeming Gutka a tobacco product falling under Heading 24.04. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of Supreme Court interpretations, setting aside the Revenue&#039;s classification and confirming the appellant&#039;s position. This case underscores the importance of judicial decisions and adherence to legal precedents in determining the correct classification of goods for excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>