<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1005 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795119</link>
    <description>At the discharge stage in money-laundering prosecutions, the court examines only whether the complaint and supporting material disclose a prima facie case or strong suspicion. Allegations that proceeds from illegal granite mining were used to acquire immovable property may satisfy the ingredients of money laundering without requiring detailed assessment of evidence, defences, asset legitimacy, or income sources. Statutory presumptions and the reverse burden relating to interconnected transactions and legitimate assets are matters for trial. The Special Court cannot assess the sustainability of pending predicate offences, and need not separately address every defence if it applies the determinative issue. Restoration of the predicate prosecution supported continuation of proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1005 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795119</link>
      <description>At the discharge stage in money-laundering prosecutions, the court examines only whether the complaint and supporting material disclose a prima facie case or strong suspicion. Allegations that proceeds from illegal granite mining were used to acquire immovable property may satisfy the ingredients of money laundering without requiring detailed assessment of evidence, defences, asset legitimacy, or income sources. Statutory presumptions and the reverse burden relating to interconnected transactions and legitimate assets are matters for trial. The Special Court cannot assess the sustainability of pending predicate offences, and need not separately address every defence if it applies the determinative issue. Restoration of the predicate prosecution supported continuation of proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>