<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1016 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795130</link>
    <description>Credible medical material establishing that a taxpayer could not timely pursue appellate remedies or effectively participate before lower authorities may constitute sufficient cause for condoning delay. The notes state that serious health conditions impaired mobility and capacity to act, making the delay neither intentional nor deliberate. They further state that where assessment and first appellate proceedings occurred without effective participation, fairness requires a fresh opportunity to explain cash deposits treated as unexplained money. The stated consequence is restoration of the deposit-addition issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after a reasonable hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1016 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795130</link>
      <description>Credible medical material establishing that a taxpayer could not timely pursue appellate remedies or effectively participate before lower authorities may constitute sufficient cause for condoning delay. The notes state that serious health conditions impaired mobility and capacity to act, making the delay neither intentional nor deliberate. They further state that where assessment and first appellate proceedings occurred without effective participation, fairness requires a fresh opportunity to explain cash deposits treated as unexplained money. The stated consequence is restoration of the deposit-addition issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after a reasonable hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>