<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1022 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795136</link>
    <description>Long-term capital-gains addition on land sale was sustained because search material evidenced cash consideration exceeding the registered sale price, while the taxpayer did not establish that the land was agricultural land outside specified municipal limits and therefore excluded from capital-gains taxation. The assessment consequently remained enforceable for both registered and unrecorded consideration. Delay in filing the appeal was condoned on sufficient cause, as electronic communication of the appellate order to an ex-employee and former auditor occurred without the taxpayer&#039;s knowledge; however, the capital-gains addition was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1022 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795136</link>
      <description>Long-term capital-gains addition on land sale was sustained because search material evidenced cash consideration exceeding the registered sale price, while the taxpayer did not establish that the land was agricultural land outside specified municipal limits and therefore excluded from capital-gains taxation. The assessment consequently remained enforceable for both registered and unrecorded consideration. Delay in filing the appeal was condoned on sufficient cause, as electronic communication of the appellate order to an ex-employee and former auditor occurred without the taxpayer&#039;s knowledge; however, the capital-gains addition was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>