<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1031 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795145</link>
    <description>Family remittances cannot be treated as unexplained income without verifying the remitters&#039; source of income and creditworthiness. Where the taxpayer has disclosed the remitters&#039; identity and relationship, notices to the remitters are required before an adverse inference is drawn. Failure to undertake that verification is a procedural defect. The assessment was set aside for fresh adjudication, requiring verification of the remittances and an opportunity for the taxpayer to produce relevant documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1031 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795145</link>
      <description>Family remittances cannot be treated as unexplained income without verifying the remitters&#039; source of income and creditworthiness. Where the taxpayer has disclosed the remitters&#039; identity and relationship, notices to the remitters are required before an adverse inference is drawn. Failure to undertake that verification is a procedural defect. The assessment was set aside for fresh adjudication, requiring verification of the remittances and an opportunity for the taxpayer to produce relevant documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>