https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795155 Rejection of revocation of cancelled GST registration was not considered open to interference because the departmental record showed that tax liability had already been quantified. The premise that no quantified liability existed was therefore factually incorrect. The taxpayer may challenge the tax-quantification order through available remedies and may subsequently seek revocation of registration after payment of tax or once that challenge attains finality, in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795155 Rejection of revocation of cancelled GST registration was not considered open to interference because the departmental record showed that tax liability had already been quantified. The premise that no quantified liability existed was therefore factually incorrect. The taxpayer may challenge the tax-quantification order through available remedies and may subsequently seek revocation of registration after payment of tax or once that challenge attains finality, in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795155