<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1043 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795157</link>
    <description>Erroneous classification of interest as tax in Form GST DRC-07 may make the statutory appellate remedy ineffective where it compels a pre-deposit not required under Section 112(8). The notes state that the demand involved input tax credit reversal, interest and penalty, with no disputed tax component; however, interest was recorded under the tax head. Although the original order was corrected, the appellate order remained unrectified after the applicable amendment period expired. This classification could require a Tribunal pre-deposit calculated on an amount wrongly shown as tax. Writ jurisdiction was therefore considered justified, with fresh appellate consideration required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1043 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795157</link>
      <description>Erroneous classification of interest as tax in Form GST DRC-07 may make the statutory appellate remedy ineffective where it compels a pre-deposit not required under Section 112(8). The notes state that the demand involved input tax credit reversal, interest and penalty, with no disputed tax component; however, interest was recorded under the tax head. Although the original order was corrected, the appellate order remained unrectified after the applicable amendment period expired. This classification could require a Tribunal pre-deposit calculated on an amount wrongly shown as tax. Writ jurisdiction was therefore considered justified, with fresh appellate consideration required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>