https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52733 In a stay application concerning differential duty and penalty, CESTAT held that the appellants had made out a case for interim protection against recovery pending appeal. The dispute arose from assessment under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for Chapter 33 goods, where the Department relied on a higher MRP printed on the pack even though it had been struck off, while the appellants contended that only the revised MRP survived. On that basis, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of duty and penalty during the appeal. en-us Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:51:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52733 In a stay application concerning differential duty and penalty, CESTAT held that the appellants had made out a case for interim protection against recovery pending appeal. The dispute arose from assessment under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for Chapter 33 goods, where the Department relied on a higher MRP printed on the pack even though it had been struck off, while the appellants contended that only the revised MRP survived. On that basis, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of duty and penalty during the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52733