<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1999 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470132</link>
    <description>For computing deemed income from property received for inadequate consideration, the first proviso to section 56(2)(x) permits use of the stamp-duty value on the agreement date rather than the registration date where the dates differ. The further proviso applies when whole or part of the consideration is paid by the prescribed banking mode on or before the agreement date. Where allotment was finalised and part consideration was paid by account-payee cheque on that date, the applicable circle rate was that prevailing in the relevant financial year of allotment. As the resulting difference was within the permissible tolerance limit, no addition was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 19:02:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1999 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470132</link>
      <description>For computing deemed income from property received for inadequate consideration, the first proviso to section 56(2)(x) permits use of the stamp-duty value on the agreement date rather than the registration date where the dates differ. The further proviso applies when whole or part of the consideration is paid by the prescribed banking mode on or before the agreement date. Where allotment was finalised and part consideration was paid by account-payee cheque on that date, the applicable circle rate was that prevailing in the relevant financial year of allotment. As the resulting difference was within the permissible tolerance limit, no addition was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>