<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 135 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found merit in the appeals regarding the Customs valuation of &#039;STAR ANISEEDS&#039; imported from Vietnam. They concluded that substituting transaction values with other prices for assessment was unjustified. The original authority was directed to reassess the consignment based on the transaction values, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 135 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found merit in the appeals regarding the Customs valuation of &#039;STAR ANISEEDS&#039; imported from Vietnam. They concluded that substituting transaction values with other prices for assessment was unjustified. The original authority was directed to reassess the consignment based on the transaction values, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>