<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1629 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470120</link>
    <description>Addition for unexplained investment under Section 69 based on alleged cash on-money payment for a residential flat was unsustainable where the allegation for the relevant tower rested solely on estimated sale rates. The related developer&#039;s additions based on estimates without supporting seized material had been deleted, and no evidence established actual cash payment beyond the documented purchase price. The addition was therefore directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:22:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1629 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470120</link>
      <description>Addition for unexplained investment under Section 69 based on alleged cash on-money payment for a residential flat was unsustainable where the allegation for the relevant tower rested solely on estimated sale rates. The related developer&#039;s additions based on estimates without supporting seized material had been deleted, and no evidence established actual cash payment beyond the documented purchase price. The addition was therefore directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>