<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 988 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795102</link>
    <description>Reassessment cannot be initiated merely by revisiting share transactions that were specifically examined during the original scrutiny assessment. Detailed queries, replies and supporting documents had already been considered while completing the assessment under Section 143(3), and the reopening relied on the same material without any fresh basis. Such reassessment amounts to an impermissible review founded on a change of opinion and is invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 988 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795102</link>
      <description>Reassessment cannot be initiated merely by revisiting share transactions that were specifically examined during the original scrutiny assessment. Detailed queries, replies and supporting documents had already been considered while completing the assessment under Section 143(3), and the reopening relied on the same material without any fresh basis. Such reassessment amounts to an impermissible review founded on a change of opinion and is invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>