<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 917 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795031</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit is available to a manufacturer for eligible duty-paid inputs received at its premises and used through a contractor to fabricate storage tanks and mechanical piping for excisable manufacture, provided prescribed conditions and valid duty documents are satisfied. The contractor&#039;s use of the inputs does not itself defeat credit. However, credit is unavailable where the contractor has claimed works-contract composition-scheme service-tax abatement on the same inputs, because this would create a double benefit. Extended limitation cannot apply merely because input use was not separately disclosed in returns where records, audits and requested information were available; wilful suppression, fraud, collusion or intent to evade duty must be established. Credit must therefore be re-quantified accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 917 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795031</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit is available to a manufacturer for eligible duty-paid inputs received at its premises and used through a contractor to fabricate storage tanks and mechanical piping for excisable manufacture, provided prescribed conditions and valid duty documents are satisfied. The contractor&#039;s use of the inputs does not itself defeat credit. However, credit is unavailable where the contractor has claimed works-contract composition-scheme service-tax abatement on the same inputs, because this would create a double benefit. Extended limitation cannot apply merely because input use was not separately disclosed in returns where records, audits and requested information were available; wilful suppression, fraud, collusion or intent to evade duty must be established. Credit must therefore be re-quantified accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>