https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795038 Section 44 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires the money-laundering offence and connected scheduled offence to be tried by the Special Court with jurisdiction over the laundering offence. Where laundering-related acts occur across different local areas, the Code of Criminal Procedure permits trial in any area where part of the offence occurred. Acquisition of alleged proceeds at Gurugram supported jurisdiction there, while seizure or attachment of other alleged proceeds at Delhi supported concurrent Delhi jurisdiction. Because the scheduled offence had been transferred to Delhi, the notes state that trying both matters before the same Delhi PMLA Special Court was required and expedient. en-us Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795038 Section 44 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires the money-laundering offence and connected scheduled offence to be tried by the Special Court with jurisdiction over the laundering offence. Where laundering-related acts occur across different local areas, the Code of Criminal Procedure permits trial in any area where part of the offence occurred. Acquisition of alleged proceeds at Gurugram supported jurisdiction there, while seizure or attachment of other alleged proceeds at Delhi supported concurrent Delhi jurisdiction. Because the scheduled offence had been transferred to Delhi, the notes state that trying both matters before the same Delhi PMLA Special Court was required and expedient. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795038