https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795038 PMLA territorial jurisdiction may arise in multiple local areas where different money-laundering processes occur. Section 44 requires the money-laundering offence and connected scheduled offence to be tried by the Special Court having jurisdiction over the PMLA offence. Read with Section 178(d) of the CrPC and Section 46 of the PMLA, a court may exercise jurisdiction where any component act occurred. Acquisition of proceeds of crime at Gurugram supported jurisdiction there, while seizure or attachment of proceeds at Delhi created concurrent jurisdiction for the Delhi Special Court. Transfer to Delhi was required where the scheduled offence had already been transferred there, ensuring joint trial before the same Special Court. en-us Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795038 PMLA territorial jurisdiction may arise in multiple local areas where different money-laundering processes occur. Section 44 requires the money-laundering offence and connected scheduled offence to be tried by the Special Court having jurisdiction over the PMLA offence. Read with Section 178(d) of the CrPC and Section 46 of the PMLA, a court may exercise jurisdiction where any component act occurred. Acquisition of proceeds of crime at Gurugram supported jurisdiction there, while seizure or attachment of proceeds at Delhi created concurrent jurisdiction for the Delhi Special Court. Transfer to Delhi was required where the scheduled offence had already been transferred there, ensuring joint trial before the same Special Court. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795038