<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 927 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795041</link>
    <description>Disciplinary action against an insolvency professional must be taken by a Disciplinary Committee composed only of whole-time members; the Chairperson cannot exercise that reserved function, rendering a cancellation order void. The statutory framework also requires inspection or investigation, a report, and compliant initiation before a show-cause notice and disciplinary proceedings. Adverse appellate observations cannot replace the prescribed inquiry, particularly where an earlier inspection found no illegality. Non-compliance with the authorised decision-maker and mandatory process vitiates the proceedings, while fresh action may be initiated in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 927 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795041</link>
      <description>Disciplinary action against an insolvency professional must be taken by a Disciplinary Committee composed only of whole-time members; the Chairperson cannot exercise that reserved function, rendering a cancellation order void. The statutory framework also requires inspection or investigation, a report, and compliant initiation before a show-cause notice and disciplinary proceedings. Adverse appellate observations cannot replace the prescribed inquiry, particularly where an earlier inspection found no illegality. Non-compliance with the authorised decision-maker and mandatory process vitiates the proceedings, while fresh action may be initiated in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>