<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 955 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795069</link>
    <description>Salary payments did not require tax deduction at source because, after the standard deduction, all but one employee had taxable income below the basic exemption threshold. For the remaining employee, the available rebate fully offset the tax liability. As no tax was deductible from the salary payments, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 955 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795069</link>
      <description>Salary payments did not require tax deduction at source because, after the standard deduction, all but one employee had taxable income below the basic exemption threshold. For the remaining employee, the available rebate fully offset the tax liability. As no tax was deductible from the salary payments, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>