<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 130 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52719</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting SSI Notification No. 140/83 benefit to respondents who cleared products under their own brand name. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere as the brand name was registered in favor of the present respondent after being used by family members. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 130 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52719</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting SSI Notification No. 140/83 benefit to respondents who cleared products under their own brand name. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere as the brand name was registered in favor of the present respondent after being used by family members. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>