<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 976 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795090</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was not entertainable because no order authorising arrest had been issued under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In the absence of such an order, the applicant could not be arrested, and the asserted apprehension of arrest was insufficient to warrant anticipatory bail at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:07:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 976 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795090</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was not entertainable because no order authorising arrest had been issued under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In the absence of such an order, the applicant could not be arrested, and the asserted apprehension of arrest was insufficient to warrant anticipatory bail at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>