https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52718 Prominent use of a manufacturer's own mark on goods and packing, together with its name and address, did not amount to affixing another person's brand name merely because the product also referred to technical collaboration and a licence from ITL. The reference was treated as indicating technical know-how and association with a collaborator, not as use of ITL's trade name for exemption purposes. On that basis, the condition for denying benefit under Notification No. 1/93 was not met, and the exemption remained available. en-us Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:33:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52718 Prominent use of a manufacturer's own mark on goods and packing, together with its name and address, did not amount to affixing another person's brand name merely because the product also referred to technical collaboration and a licence from ITL. The reference was treated as indicating technical know-how and association with a collaborator, not as use of ITL's trade name for exemption purposes. On that basis, the condition for denying benefit under Notification No. 1/93 was not met, and the exemption remained available. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52718