<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1989 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470097</link>
    <description>In a limited-scrutiny assessment selected only to verify contract-receipt mismatches between Form 26AS and the return, enquiry must remain confined to that issue. The notes state that reconciliation was furnished and no adverse finding was made on the selected parameter. A disallowance of expenditure was a separate issue and could be examined only after the Assessing Officer formed a reasonable view, obtained written approval from the competent authority and converted the case to complete scrutiny. As no such conversion occurred, the disallowance was beyond the scope of limited scrutiny and the appellate order sustaining it was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:59:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1989 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470097</link>
      <description>In a limited-scrutiny assessment selected only to verify contract-receipt mismatches between Form 26AS and the return, enquiry must remain confined to that issue. The notes state that reconciliation was furnished and no adverse finding was made on the selected parameter. A disallowance of expenditure was a separate issue and could be examined only after the Assessing Officer formed a reasonable view, obtained written approval from the competent authority and converted the case to complete scrutiny. As no such conversion occurred, the disallowance was beyond the scope of limited scrutiny and the appellate order sustaining it was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>