<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2029 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470109</link>
    <description>Section 11 exemption cannot be denied for an alleged shortfall in transfers to an Indigent Patient Fund where compliance with the Scheme is not a condition for examining exemption after Section 12A registration. Whether doctors&#039; fees form part of gross billing and whether the Scheme was breached falls within the Charity Commissioner&#039;s exclusive jurisdiction. In the absence of an adverse finding or revocation of charitable status, the Revenue cannot determine a breach. Revision under Section 263 also requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; it cannot rest on disagreement where two sustainable views exist.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:59:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2029 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470109</link>
      <description>Section 11 exemption cannot be denied for an alleged shortfall in transfers to an Indigent Patient Fund where compliance with the Scheme is not a condition for examining exemption after Section 12A registration. Whether doctors&#039; fees form part of gross billing and whether the Scheme was breached falls within the Charity Commissioner&#039;s exclusive jurisdiction. In the absence of an adverse finding or revocation of charitable status, the Revenue cannot determine a breach. Revision under Section 263 also requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; it cannot rest on disagreement where two sustainable views exist.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>