https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52710 An endorsement of protest on a TR-6 challan was treated as sufficient compliance with the procedure for payment under protest where duty was paid only once through that challan. The protest notation itself was held enough, with no further procedural step required under Rule 233B(4) in the absence of additional payments. On that basis, the refund claim was not barred by limitation, and the limitation objection failed. en-us Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:02:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52710 An endorsement of protest on a TR-6 challan was treated as sufficient compliance with the procedure for payment under protest where duty was paid only once through that challan. The protest notation itself was held enough, with no further procedural step required under Rule 233B(4) in the absence of additional payments. On that basis, the refund claim was not barred by limitation, and the limitation objection failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52710