<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 831 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794945</link>
    <description>Inclusion of royalty, District Mineral Foundation and National Mineral Exploration Trust payments in sale value for computing average sale price and royalty is constitutionally valid under the 2016 and 2017 Rules. The computation method is treated as a regulatory measure with a reasonable nexus to the levy because it addresses manipulation and evasion in determining average sale price. Subordinate legislation remains valid unless it violates fundamental rights, conflicts with the parent statute, exceeds legislative competence or is manifestly arbitrary. The three-year restriction on royalty-rate revision does not bar prescription of the levy&#039;s computational method, and coal pricing is not comparable because it operates under a different mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:22:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 831 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794945</link>
      <description>Inclusion of royalty, District Mineral Foundation and National Mineral Exploration Trust payments in sale value for computing average sale price and royalty is constitutionally valid under the 2016 and 2017 Rules. The computation method is treated as a regulatory measure with a reasonable nexus to the levy because it addresses manipulation and evasion in determining average sale price. Subordinate legislation remains valid unless it violates fundamental rights, conflicts with the parent statute, exceeds legislative competence or is manifestly arbitrary. The three-year restriction on royalty-rate revision does not bar prescription of the levy&#039;s computational method, and coal pricing is not comparable because it operates under a different mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>