<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 833 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794947</link>
    <description>Imported sugar fell within the pre-2001 Karnataka sales tax exemption because the entry referred to the commodity without imposing an Indian-origin requirement. The later retrospective restriction of the exemption to sugar produced or manufactured in India was a substantive but constitutionally valid exercise of legislative competence. Its consequences were limited: principal tax could be reassessed and recovered, but pre-amendment penalty could not be imposed where dealers had acted under the earlier exemption and had not collected tax. Interest could accrue only from a lawful reassessment demand. Inter-State sales liability required recomputation under the applicable Central Sales Tax provisions, with impermissible penalty or interest adjusted against principal dues or refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:22:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 833 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794947</link>
      <description>Imported sugar fell within the pre-2001 Karnataka sales tax exemption because the entry referred to the commodity without imposing an Indian-origin requirement. The later retrospective restriction of the exemption to sugar produced or manufactured in India was a substantive but constitutionally valid exercise of legislative competence. Its consequences were limited: principal tax could be reassessed and recovered, but pre-amendment penalty could not be imposed where dealers had acted under the earlier exemption and had not collected tax. Interest could accrue only from a lawful reassessment demand. Inter-State sales liability required recomputation under the applicable Central Sales Tax provisions, with impermissible penalty or interest adjusted against principal dues or refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>