https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794955 Contractual recovery claims involving disputed deductions, service tax and labour cess components are ordinarily unsuitable for Article 226 writ jurisdiction where a civil suit provides an effective remedy. The notes state that Article 113 of the Limitation Act imposes a three-year period, with each deduction from a bill creating a separate cause of action from its date; monthly invoices do not by themselves establish a running account. Time-barred claims cannot be revived through writ proceedings by relying on later favourable decisions in similar matters, particularly where most deductions predated the COVID-19 limitation-extension period. en-us Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:22:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794955 Contractual recovery claims involving disputed deductions, service tax and labour cess components are ordinarily unsuitable for Article 226 writ jurisdiction where a civil suit provides an effective remedy. The notes state that Article 113 of the Limitation Act imposes a three-year period, with each deduction from a bill creating a separate cause of action from its date; monthly invoices do not by themselves establish a running account. Time-barred claims cannot be revived through writ proceedings by relying on later favourable decisions in similar matters, particularly where most deductions predated the COVID-19 limitation-extension period. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794955