<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 122 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52702</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue failed to substantiate the claim that the electronic goods were smuggled into the country. Consequently, the orders for confiscation and penalties under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, were deemed unlawful. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 122 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52702</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue failed to substantiate the claim that the electronic goods were smuggled into the country. Consequently, the orders for confiscation and penalties under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, were deemed unlawful. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>