https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794967 Limitation for filing an appeal was examined by reference to the actual receipt of the Order-in-Original. The appellant requested a copy of the order and received it by departmental email; despite an inconsistent order number and date in the email body, the request reference and attached order indicated a typographical error. The appeal was filed within the normal two-month period calculated from actual receipt. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) to verify the documentary evidence, including the adjudication order, and decide afresh. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794967 Limitation for filing an appeal was examined by reference to the actual receipt of the Order-in-Original. The appellant requested a copy of the order and received it by departmental email; despite an inconsistent order number and date in the email body, the request reference and attached order indicated a typographical error. The appeal was filed within the normal two-month period calculated from actual receipt. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) to verify the documentary evidence, including the adjudication order, and decide afresh. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794967