<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 856 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794970</link>
    <description>Destruction of obsolete duty-free inputs within an Export Oriented Unit after due intimation does not constitute clearance for home consumption or diversion where there is no misuse or breach of the scheme. The Foreign Trade Policy permitting such destruction must be read harmoniously with Customs and Central Excise exemption notifications. The 2015 amendments expressly permitting destruction of inputs aligned the notifications with the existing policy, removed ambiguity and are described as clarificatory and retrospective. Consequently, no duty arose on the destruction; related interest and penalties lacked basis absent suppression, wilful misstatement or intent to evade duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 856 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794970</link>
      <description>Destruction of obsolete duty-free inputs within an Export Oriented Unit after due intimation does not constitute clearance for home consumption or diversion where there is no misuse or breach of the scheme. The Foreign Trade Policy permitting such destruction must be read harmoniously with Customs and Central Excise exemption notifications. The 2015 amendments expressly permitting destruction of inputs aligned the notifications with the existing policy, removed ambiguity and are described as clarificatory and retrospective. Consequently, no duty arose on the destruction; related interest and penalties lacked basis absent suppression, wilful misstatement or intent to evade duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>