<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 858 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794972</link>
    <description>Late filing fee under Section 46(3) of the Customs Act read with Regulation 4 of the Bill of Entry Regulations was not warranted for supplementary Bills of Entry covering excess bulk coal arising from natural cargo variations. The original Bills of Entry for manifested quantities were timely filed and duty was paid, while the excess quantity was identified through prescribed procedures due to moisture, physical weighment and draught-survey differences. In the absence of suppression, misdeclaration, revenue loss, deliberate delay or mala fide conduct, late fee need not be imposed mechanically where sufficient cause supports delayed filing. The fee was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 858 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794972</link>
      <description>Late filing fee under Section 46(3) of the Customs Act read with Regulation 4 of the Bill of Entry Regulations was not warranted for supplementary Bills of Entry covering excess bulk coal arising from natural cargo variations. The original Bills of Entry for manifested quantities were timely filed and duty was paid, while the excess quantity was identified through prescribed procedures due to moisture, physical weighment and draught-survey differences. In the absence of suppression, misdeclaration, revenue loss, deliberate delay or mala fide conduct, late fee need not be imposed mechanically where sufficient cause supports delayed filing. The fee was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>