<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 862 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794976</link>
    <description>Pre-amendment section 54F applicable to Assessment Year 2009-10 did not restrict capital-gains deduction to construction of a single residential unit; replacement of &quot;a residential house&quot; with &quot;one residential house&quot; operated prospectively. Construction need not conform to an approved building plan, nor is production of statutory approval a condition for relief, provided a residential house is constructed within the prescribed period. Where an undisputed valuation report establishes timely construction and investment, incomplete bank statements alone do not defeat the claim; concerns regarding the source of investment may be examined separately. The stated conditions for section 54F deduction were therefore satisfied and the related addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 862 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794976</link>
      <description>Pre-amendment section 54F applicable to Assessment Year 2009-10 did not restrict capital-gains deduction to construction of a single residential unit; replacement of &quot;a residential house&quot; with &quot;one residential house&quot; operated prospectively. Construction need not conform to an approved building plan, nor is production of statutory approval a condition for relief, provided a residential house is constructed within the prescribed period. Where an undisputed valuation report establishes timely construction and investment, incomplete bank statements alone do not defeat the claim; concerns regarding the source of investment may be examined separately. The stated conditions for section 54F deduction were therefore satisfied and the related addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>