<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 877 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794991</link>
    <description>Transfer of Transferable Development Rights or a Development Right Certificate for Assessment Year 2016-17 was outside the capital gains charge because sections 45 and 48 require an ascertainable cost of acquisition or a statutory deeming mechanism. The statutory entitlement was not acquired for monetary consideration, and the pre-amendment cost provision did not cover development rights or prescribe their cost. The later inclusion of other intangible assets or rights applied prospectively from Assessment Year 2024-25. Consequently, failure of the computation mechanism meant that the capital gains charge did not arise; alternative exemption and valuation issues remained academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 877 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794991</link>
      <description>Transfer of Transferable Development Rights or a Development Right Certificate for Assessment Year 2016-17 was outside the capital gains charge because sections 45 and 48 require an ascertainable cost of acquisition or a statutory deeming mechanism. The statutory entitlement was not acquired for monetary consideration, and the pre-amendment cost provision did not cover development rights or prescribe their cost. The later inclusion of other intangible assets or rights applied prospectively from Assessment Year 2024-25. Consequently, failure of the computation mechanism meant that the capital gains charge did not arise; alternative exemption and valuation issues remained academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>