<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 172 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52696</link>
    <description>Suspension and confirmation of suspension of a customs house agent licence under Regulation 21(2) were upheld where the Commissioner acted promptly on a report alleging involvement in a drawback fraud and use of a bogus exporter without proper authorisation. The order was found to be detailed and reasoned, and the objection that no urgency existed or that there was non-application of mind was rejected. The challenge to the suspension therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:20:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 172 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52696</link>
      <description>Suspension and confirmation of suspension of a customs house agent licence under Regulation 21(2) were upheld where the Commissioner acted promptly on a report alleging involvement in a drawback fraud and use of a bogus exporter without proper authorisation. The order was found to be detailed and reasoned, and the objection that no urgency existed or that there was non-application of mind was rejected. The challenge to the suspension therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>