<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 117 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52694</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the remand order, upholding the transaction value for imported fabric and allowing the appeals. It emphasized adherence to transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules, rejecting the imposition of penalties under SS112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to insufficient evidence on the proposed manufacture program.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 117 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52694</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the remand order, upholding the transaction value for imported fabric and allowing the appeals. It emphasized adherence to transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules, rejecting the imposition of penalties under SS112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to insufficient evidence on the proposed manufacture program.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>