<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Contractual deduction claims cannot evade limitation through writ jurisdiction; disputed monetary recovery belongs in a civil suit.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101702</link>
    <description>Writ petitions seeking recovery of contractual deductions may be barred by limitation where each deduction creates a separate cause of action. The article explains that limitation for a recovery suit runs from the date of each deduction, rather than contract completion, where monthly invoices and payments do not establish a running account; pandemic-related limitation extensions cannot revive already time-barred claims. Invoking Article 226 cannot circumvent limitation, delay, or laches. It further notes that purely monetary contractual disputes involving disputed facts and requiring evidence should ordinarily be pursued through a civil suit. Accordingly, such refund claims are described as not maintainable in writ jurisdiction and liable to dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:21:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:21:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Contractual deduction claims cannot evade limitation through writ jurisdiction; disputed monetary recovery belongs in a civil suit.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101702</link>
      <description>Writ petitions seeking recovery of contractual deductions may be barred by limitation where each deduction creates a separate cause of action. The article explains that limitation for a recovery suit runs from the date of each deduction, rather than contract completion, where monthly invoices and payments do not establish a running account; pandemic-related limitation extensions cannot revive already time-barred claims. Invoking Article 226 cannot circumvent limitation, delay, or laches. It further notes that purely monetary contractual disputes involving disputed facts and requiring evidence should ordinarily be pursued through a civil suit. Accordingly, such refund claims are described as not maintainable in writ jurisdiction and liable to dismissal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:21:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>