https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470048 At the admission stage of a second appeal, a respondent present on caveat may address whether a substantial question of law arises; Section 100 CPC does not impose an absolute bar. Interference with concurrent factual findings is limited to cases involving recognised legal defects, including absence or disregard of evidence, inadmissible evidence, erroneous legal inference, perversity, or incorrect burden of proof. Findings supported by pleadings and evidence on the use of premises and lack of suitable alternate accommodation generally do not meet that threshold. For eviction under Section 12(1)(f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, Section 12(6) requirements apply mandatorily and automatically; their omission from the decree is treated as a formal defect enforceable by the executing court. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:02:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470048 At the admission stage of a second appeal, a respondent present on caveat may address whether a substantial question of law arises; Section 100 CPC does not impose an absolute bar. Interference with concurrent factual findings is limited to cases involving recognised legal defects, including absence or disregard of evidence, inadmissible evidence, erroneous legal inference, perversity, or incorrect burden of proof. Findings supported by pleadings and evidence on the use of premises and lack of suitable alternate accommodation generally do not meet that threshold. For eviction under Section 12(1)(f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, Section 12(6) requirements apply mandatorily and automatically; their omission from the decree is treated as a formal defect enforceable by the executing court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470048