<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1747 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470050</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction for a notice under Section 143(2) depends on the issuing Assessing Officer&#039;s authority when the notice is issued; a subsequent transfer of the case does not invalidate it. Transfer of jurisdiction is governed by Section 127, while Section 129 concerns continuation of proceedings after a change of incumbent. Where sales and quantitative details are accepted but purchases are linked to an alleged accommodation-entry provider, an estimated profit addition may replace disallowance of the entire purchases. Applying a comparable benchmark, the purchase-related disallowance was increased from 5% to 6%. The challenge to rejection of the books of account failed because no specific submissions supported it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:02:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1747 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470050</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction for a notice under Section 143(2) depends on the issuing Assessing Officer&#039;s authority when the notice is issued; a subsequent transfer of the case does not invalidate it. Transfer of jurisdiction is governed by Section 127, while Section 129 concerns continuation of proceedings after a change of incumbent. Where sales and quantitative details are accepted but purchases are linked to an alleged accommodation-entry provider, an estimated profit addition may replace disallowance of the entire purchases. Applying a comparable benchmark, the purchase-related disallowance was increased from 5% to 6%. The challenge to rejection of the books of account failed because no specific submissions supported it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>