<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1962 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470054</link>
    <description>Cash deposits claimed to represent proceeds of gold loans require reliable evidence linking the loans to the deposits. The analysis states that the assessee failed to file a return or provide an explanation and supporting material during reassessment proceedings. Gold loan certificates produced in appeal did not establish the dates or mode of disbursal, while sanction letters and other primary records were absent. The evidentiary burden to prove the source of the deposits therefore remained undischarged, and no additional material connected the deposits with the alleged loans. On that basis, the addition relating to the cash deposits was treated as sustainable against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:02:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1962 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470054</link>
      <description>Cash deposits claimed to represent proceeds of gold loans require reliable evidence linking the loans to the deposits. The analysis states that the assessee failed to file a return or provide an explanation and supporting material during reassessment proceedings. Gold loan certificates produced in appeal did not establish the dates or mode of disbursal, while sanction letters and other primary records were absent. The evidentiary burden to prove the source of the deposits therefore remained undischarged, and no additional material connected the deposits with the alleged loans. On that basis, the addition relating to the cash deposits was treated as sustainable against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>