<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 167 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52685</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, granting input duty credit to the appellants. The denial of credit was based on inputs being sent directly to job workers, but rules do not prohibit this. The appellants were found eligible for the credit, and lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:52:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 167 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52685</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, granting input duty credit to the appellants. The denial of credit was based on inputs being sent directly to job workers, but rules do not prohibit this. The appellants were found eligible for the credit, and lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>