<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 1082 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470042</link>
    <description>Second appeals may be entertained only after the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law arises. The memorandum must precisely state that question, the High Court must formulate it after recording its satisfaction, and the appeal must be heard on the formulated question while allowing the respondent to challenge whether it exists. Mere reference to memorandum grounds, without formulation and adjudication of a substantial question of law, is insufficient, particularly where concurrent findings are reversed. Non-compliance with these mandatory requirements invalidates the prescribed process for hearing and determining a second appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 1082 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470042</link>
      <description>Second appeals may be entertained only after the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law arises. The memorandum must precisely state that question, the High Court must formulate it after recording its satisfaction, and the appeal must be heard on the formulated question while allowing the respondent to challenge whether it exists. Mere reference to memorandum grounds, without formulation and adjudication of a substantial question of law, is insufficient, particularly where concurrent findings are reversed. Non-compliance with these mandatory requirements invalidates the prescribed process for hearing and determining a second appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>