https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470040 At the stage of discharge or quashing, courts ordinarily do not assess the truthfulness of the complaint or weigh disputed defence evidence. Inherent jurisdiction may nevertheless be exercised where the accused produces sterling and impeccable material that completely displaces the allegations, cannot reasonably be refuted, and shows that continuation of the prosecution would abuse process. Public sale documents, notarized declarations, receipts, and a departmental enquiry report may establish this threshold where they support the transaction and the departmental exoneration on merits concerns the same factual allegations. In such circumstances, continuation of criminal proceedings for cheating and intimidation may become impermissible. en-us Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jul 2026 13:11:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470040 At the stage of discharge or quashing, courts ordinarily do not assess the truthfulness of the complaint or weigh disputed defence evidence. Inherent jurisdiction may nevertheless be exercised where the accused produces sterling and impeccable material that completely displaces the allegations, cannot reasonably be refuted, and shows that continuation of the prosecution would abuse process. Public sale documents, notarized declarations, receipts, and a departmental enquiry report may establish this threshold where they support the transaction and the departmental exoneration on merits concerns the same factual allegations. In such circumstances, continuation of criminal proceedings for cheating and intimidation may become impermissible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470040