<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1850 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470035</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of the service tax demand was waived pending appeal because prima facie uncertainty existed over classification as a telecom authority and the scope of alleged business auxiliary services. Undue hardship from requiring a deposit, together with the balance of convenience, supported interim protection. The waiver did not determine the underlying service-tax classification or liability, which remained open for final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1850 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470035</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of the service tax demand was waived pending appeal because prima facie uncertainty existed over classification as a telecom authority and the scope of alleged business auxiliary services. Undue hardship from requiring a deposit, together with the balance of convenience, supported interim protection. The waiver did not determine the underlying service-tax classification or liability, which remained open for final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>