<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 95 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the classification and process of printing issues, remanding the matter for reevaluation of duty liability. They upheld the Modvat claim and addressed the time limitation for demands, allowing the appeal for further computation of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:38:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 95 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the classification and process of printing issues, remanding the matter for reevaluation of duty liability. They upheld the Modvat claim and addressed the time limitation for demands, allowing the appeal for further computation of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>