<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 810 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794924</link>
    <description>Section 245C(1) requires a settlement application to provide a full and true disclosure of undisclosed income, the manner of its derivation, and the additional tax payable. A disclosure presented as business income was treated as insufficient where the application did not identify the relevant years, source, or documentary basis for the stated stock-in-trade. The requirement applies to the application as a whole, so a supported partial disclosure does not cure a material unsubstantiated component. Once the statutory disclosure threshold is not met, the Settlement Commission cannot reclassify the amount as unexplained investment under Section 69B or apply Section 115BBE(1); the application must be rejected in entirety, leaving tax treatment to regular assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 08:26:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 810 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794924</link>
      <description>Section 245C(1) requires a settlement application to provide a full and true disclosure of undisclosed income, the manner of its derivation, and the additional tax payable. A disclosure presented as business income was treated as insufficient where the application did not identify the relevant years, source, or documentary basis for the stated stock-in-trade. The requirement applies to the application as a whole, so a supported partial disclosure does not cure a material unsubstantiated component. Once the statutory disclosure threshold is not met, the Settlement Commission cannot reclassify the amount as unexplained investment under Section 69B or apply Section 115BBE(1); the application must be rejected in entirety, leaving tax treatment to regular assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>