<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 818 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794932</link>
    <description>Section 56(2)(ix) applies only to money received during negotiations for transferring a capital asset where the negotiations fail and the money is subsequently forfeited. Advances provided to identify, procure and acquire land for third-party business projects do not meet that condition where the proposed land is stock-in-trade, which is excluded from the definition of capital asset under Section 2(14). The provision also requires actual forfeiture: continued recognition of advances as liabilities, passage of time and absence of a refund claim do not establish absolute entitlement to retain them. Legal extinguishment requires more than creditor inaction or non-traceability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 08:26:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 818 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794932</link>
      <description>Section 56(2)(ix) applies only to money received during negotiations for transferring a capital asset where the negotiations fail and the money is subsequently forfeited. Advances provided to identify, procure and acquire land for third-party business projects do not meet that condition where the proposed land is stock-in-trade, which is excluded from the definition of capital asset under Section 2(14). The provision also requires actual forfeiture: continued recognition of advances as liabilities, passage of time and absence of a refund claim do not establish absolute entitlement to retain them. Legal extinguishment requires more than creditor inaction or non-traceability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>