<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>US citizen found guilty of helping export tech to Iran in violation of sanctions</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73784</link>
    <description>US export-control sanctions prohibit the unlawful export of electronic components to Iran through intermediaries or front companies. The reported prosecution concerned allegations that an employee conspired with an Iranian business associate to obtain components for a Tehran-based company whose technology had potential military applications. Prosecutors relied on documents, text messages, photographs, and communications said to show knowledge and assistance, while the defence disputed procurement, the Swiss company&#039;s characterization as a front, and proof that components reached Iran. Evidence concerning a specific drone attack was limited to general evidence about the Iranian company and potential military applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 21:16:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 21:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>US citizen found guilty of helping export tech to Iran in violation of sanctions</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73784</link>
      <description>US export-control sanctions prohibit the unlawful export of electronic components to Iran through intermediaries or front companies. The reported prosecution concerned allegations that an employee conspired with an Iranian business associate to obtain components for a Tehran-based company whose technology had potential military applications. Prosecutors relied on documents, text messages, photographs, and communications said to show knowledge and assistance, while the defence disputed procurement, the Swiss company&#039;s characterization as a front, and proof that components reached Iran. Evidence concerning a specific drone attack was limited to general evidence about the Iranian company and potential military applications.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 21:16:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>