<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1949 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470018</link>
    <description>Futures and Options profits cannot be treated as fictitious income or unexplained cash credits merely on internal departmental information alleging client code modification. Independent corroborative evidence, including transaction-specific details, broker particulars, or proof of manipulated trades and profit shifting, is required to sustain such an addition. Where no such evidence establishes the taxpayer&#039;s connivance or mala fide conduct, the addition fails. Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot continue when it rests solely on a deleted quantum addition; deletion of the underlying addition removes the basis for penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 18:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1949 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470018</link>
      <description>Futures and Options profits cannot be treated as fictitious income or unexplained cash credits merely on internal departmental information alleging client code modification. Independent corroborative evidence, including transaction-specific details, broker particulars, or proof of manipulated trades and profit shifting, is required to sustain such an addition. Where no such evidence establishes the taxpayer&#039;s connivance or mala fide conduct, the addition fails. Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars cannot continue when it rests solely on a deleted quantum addition; deletion of the underlying addition removes the basis for penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>