<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 718 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794832</link>
    <description>Excise duty demand based solely on ER-6 returns cannot be sustained where ER-1 and ER-6 returns disclose coal receipts, removals and closing balances, and no independent investigation or corroborative evidence establishes that Cenvat-availed coal was cleared to third parties. Matching figures in the show cause notice and statutory returns negate suppression, preventing invocation of the extended limitation period. The demand was therefore unsustainable on both merits and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 718 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794832</link>
      <description>Excise duty demand based solely on ER-6 returns cannot be sustained where ER-1 and ER-6 returns disclose coal receipts, removals and closing balances, and no independent investigation or corroborative evidence establishes that Cenvat-availed coal was cleared to third parties. Matching figures in the show cause notice and statutory returns negate suppression, preventing invocation of the extended limitation period. The demand was therefore unsustainable on both merits and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>