<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 726 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794840</link>
    <description>Director liability under Section 42 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 is described as arising only where the person was in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business at the relevant time, or where consent, connivance or neglect is established. The text states that mere designation as a director is insufficient without proof of responsibility for finance, banking, export-import or compliance functions. It further notes that where explanations limiting the director&#039;s role to technical and administrative work are not meaningfully addressed, the statutory basis for penalty is not made out, resulting in the penalty being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 726 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794840</link>
      <description>Director liability under Section 42 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 is described as arising only where the person was in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business at the relevant time, or where consent, connivance or neglect is established. The text states that mere designation as a director is insufficient without proof of responsibility for finance, banking, export-import or compliance functions. It further notes that where explanations limiting the director&#039;s role to technical and administrative work are not meaningfully addressed, the statutory basis for penalty is not made out, resulting in the penalty being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>