<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 744 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794858</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking directions for tax and enforcement action on an alleged cash transaction was treated as premature. The request for mandamus followed unsuccessful challenges in conviction proceedings and was viewed as an attempt to pursue another route concerning the same transaction. Apprehension of liability for accepting cash loans or deposits was considered speculative and unsupported by cogent material. Writ jurisdiction was not invoked where the proceeding appeared driven by personal scores. The petitioner was left to ordinary legal remedies, while the Income Tax Department could consider the representation in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 744 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794858</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking directions for tax and enforcement action on an alleged cash transaction was treated as premature. The request for mandamus followed unsuccessful challenges in conviction proceedings and was viewed as an attempt to pursue another route concerning the same transaction. Apprehension of liability for accepting cash loans or deposits was considered speculative and unsupported by cogent material. Writ jurisdiction was not invoked where the proceeding appeared driven by personal scores. The petitioner was left to ordinary legal remedies, while the Income Tax Department could consider the representation in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>