<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 750 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794864</link>
    <description>Input Tax Credit cannot be denied solely because the supplier&#039;s GST registration was cancelled retrospectively where the transaction records themselves have not been examined. The text states that the assessment orders rejected the credit claim mainly on retrospective cancellation, without testing whether actual supply of goods was established through invoices, e-way bills, lorry receipts and related documents. It identifies the legal point that genuineness of the underlying transaction must be examined on available records before rejecting credit. On that basis, the impugned assessment orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after giving a reasonable opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=911334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 750 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794864</link>
      <description>Input Tax Credit cannot be denied solely because the supplier&#039;s GST registration was cancelled retrospectively where the transaction records themselves have not been examined. The text states that the assessment orders rejected the credit claim mainly on retrospective cancellation, without testing whether actual supply of goods was established through invoices, e-way bills, lorry receipts and related documents. It identifies the legal point that genuineness of the underlying transaction must be examined on available records before rejecting credit. On that basis, the impugned assessment orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after giving a reasonable opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>